Subject: | Re: [OM] 135mm f3.5 better than tests show? |
---|---|
From: | Roger Wesson <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 12 May 2002 23:47:42 +0100 |
I'm becoming more and more enamoured with my 135/3.5. Having previously owned a Soligor 135/2.8 with a mucky rear element which fell into three pieces I would have been impressed by almost any lens but I am very impressed by the sharpness and contrast of this lens. My TOPE 9 entry was shot with it and I've no doubt it'll get lots more use. Roger Pete Prunskunas wrote: > > Gary's tests show the 135mm f3.5 to be a solid 'B' performer. > How does the lens react in the real world? > > Pete > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Without a lens cap, dreammoose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Hard cases (was: Without a lens cap), Pete Prunskunas |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 135mm f3.5 better than tests show?, Tom Scales |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 135mm f3.5 better than tests show?, T . Clausen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |