Re: [OM] SC vs MC rehashed (again...)

[tom wagner]

Sorry for the 2 post intended for personal exchange

On Sat, 11 May 2002 23:26:36 -0400
 "tom wagner" <sally30@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I suppose those that are in high places need not respond 
> to peasants?
> On Sat, 11 May 2002 20:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
>  Marten Beels <mbeels@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I know that we've been over and over how to tell a SC
> > lens from a MC lens.  Now we've got lots of resources
> > and info to be able to easily distinguish between the
> > two.  But this brings me to my question, how much
> > better is a MC lens then a SC lens?  I realize that
> > this is a lot more subjective then just telling one
> > apart from the other.  I understand that contrast will
> > be better on a MC lens, but does anyone have any
> > experience/comparisons between the two?  Could someone
> > pick out a photo taken with a SC lens from others
> > taken with an MC lens?  
> > Marten
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
> > http://launch.yahoo.com
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List 
> > >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: 
> > http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List 
> >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: 
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >