I'm at the store, and I see a 4 pack of Fuji Superia 400 being the same price
as a 5 pack of Kodak 200.
So I was presented with a choice. First, is it just my inherent biasness, that
I feel the Superia in graininess, is probably very close to the Kodak 200?
I like Fuji more generally, but I think I like Kodak when I am taking pictures
with people in it. I like to extra f-stop I get from 400 speed film, and so I
guess my question is:
Am I losing much resolution by picking Fuji 400 over Kodak 200? If not, then
I'll stick with the 400, it gives me indoor shots.. I generally shoot the 400
@ 320 anyway, and gives me almost perfect shots all the time..
Albert
|