Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] RE: Small Zooms (was "Average price of the 180/2.8")

Subject: [OM] RE: Small Zooms (was "Average price of the 180/2.8")
From: jowilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 15:04:09 -0600
>===== Original Message From "Mike Cormier" <ronaldcormier@xxxxxxxxxxx> =====
>For a small zoom lens, would I be better off with the Zuiko Zoom
>35-70mm/F3.6, or the S-Zuiko Zoom 35-70mm/F3.5-4.5?
>
>Or should I wait until I can bite the bullet and get the 35-80/2.8?

If you get the 35-80/2.8, I don't think you will regret it. I haven't run into 
anybody on list who has said he regretted it that I can recall. There have 
been those who have said it's not worth the money, but I don't think they were 
speaking from the experience of having owned one first.

I don't use the 35-70/3.5-4.5 much anymore and I have never owned the 3.6 
version. I do think the 35-105/3.5-4.5 is very very good and a terrific value 
for the money, if a bit on the slow side.  I prefer 2 touch zooms but I love 
the DOF scale on the 35-105.

The 35-80/2.8 is not a very small zoom however.  If that's one of the things 
you're looking for, it will indeed disappoint you.

Joel W.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] RE: Small Zooms (was "Average price of the 180/2.8"), jowilcox <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz