Le Tue, 05 Mar 2002 17:47:40 +0000, "John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
écrivit:
>Don't have the 28/2 but it does have a fine reputation as one of the better
>Zuiko lenses.
I still don't have the 28 f/2 but one day I will. (Perhaps
someone remembers my story about the strange relationship
between me and this lens. The second time I tried to buy
one it _also_ was withheld in the end by the store because
an alleged defect. <sigh>)
But on the bright side, zuikos are out there. This one should
be on its way to me soon (not quite a fang, but close, right?):
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1336888223&ed=1015230570
>Some 135/2.8 shots covering a range of usage:
> http://johnlind.tripod.com/oly/gallery/om48.html
> http://johnlind.tripod.com/oly/gallery/om54.html
> http://johnlind.tripod.com/oly/gallery/om58.html
Very interesting. 135mm has quite a remarkable perspective
to it, and you're right, it's not often seen these days.
I'd have guessed wrongly the above three shots were from
a longer telephoto lens, but there's something like
a hint of hesitation about just how close or far the
viewer is from the subject about esp the first three
pictures.
--
chris waigl
I am now prosecuting some things with an engine I formerly
writ to you of. (Robert Boyle, to Hardlib 1659)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|