Subject: | RE: [OM] Long Focus vs. Mirror Lens |
---|---|
From: | Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:41:32 -0800 |
This is the case because these mirror lenses are solid catadioptric designs, and there's no place 'inside' to put a regular diaphragm. Most have rear accessory threads for ND filters. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel J. Mitchell The Oly lens diagram for the 500/8 does not show a solid design which is typical I think. I think catadioptric designs are very rare like the old Vivitar Series 1. You are right that an aperture mechanism in front of the primary mirror would be in the light path. I do not know enough about optics to know whether an aperture mechanism could be inserted into the light path behind the primary. -- Winsor Crosby Long Beach, California < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 40/2 is a serious lens... was Don't need no stinking OM-2, ClassicVW |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Frame Skew - The Saga Continues, AG Schnozz |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] Long Focus vs. Mirror Lens, Timpe, Jim |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] Long Focus vs. Mirror Lens, Daniel J. Mitchell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |