Subject: | Re: [OM] 40/2 is a serious lens... was Don't need no stinking OM-2 |
---|---|
From: | ClassicVW@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Thu, 31 Jan 2002 13:25:46 EST |
imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Listen Joel, the little lens is a serious one ... honestly ! :>). > > You love the 85/2, I know ( and I am pretty keen on it as well), well > that looks pretty good on a chrome OM1/2 in terms of retro chic. I also recently acquired a chrome OM-1n (right after I snagged the $75 black OM-1 that I wrote about), and just a few minutes ago, my SILVERNOSE 85/2 arrived. Man, talk about reto-chic. Those two together are sweet looking. I think I like this look even more than I thought I liked the black bodies ! George S. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] 40/2 is a serious lens... was Don't need no stinking OM-2, jowilcox |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] 40/2 is a serious lens... was Don't need no stinking OM- 2, Timpe, Jim |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Silver-nose 85/2 love-in... was 40/2 is a serious lens..., Chris Barker |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 40/2 is a serious lens... was Don't need no stinking OM-2, AG Schnozz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |