At 02:16 1/27/02, Michael Darling wrote:
I'm not going to be THE photographer for the ceremony (thank god for
that...) , but I figure some fast glass and some good ole' Tri-X should let
me document some of the events.
As a "guest" and not THE photog, this is often an excellent idea. If the
photographs are successful, the B&W's are usually something nobody else
with a camera there will provide. Tri-X is a "timeless" film,
exceptionally forgiving of exposure error, and at ISO 400 you don't have to
worry as much about having enough flash power. I used Kodak's B&W Plus 400
once for the convenience of C-41 processing and will never do that
again. IMO it's a ho-hum B&W film that tries to be everything without
being anything in particular except B&W instead of color.
I am sorry to say that I _may_ abandon my trusty OM's for one of my dad's
Leicas + 35/1.4 and maybe a 90mm. If I could afford a 35/2 for my OM's,
then I'd take one of them.
If the Leica is an RF and you haven't used it that much, I suggest you
rethink the idea. I've used an RF with a very fast lens and handle mounted
flash at a wedding (not as "the" photog). Using the RF viewfinder is more
difficult than using a WYSISYG SLR viewfinder. I haven't found an RF
viewfinder yet that is as accurate with actual frame edge location as the
OM SLR's (including an OM-10). OTOH, if you've used it quite a bit and are
very comfortable working with it quickly in fast moving situations, and can
capture a "decisive moment" with it, you should be OK. [If the Leica is an
SLR, disregard this paragraph.]
-- John
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|