C.H.,
Well, my next question _would_ be why?
However, that may not be a question that can be answered by mere mortals -
or us "Olympians" for that matter :-)
Ok. Let me ask one more question.
I'm not sure it'll help but what the heck - let's get Jon more confused!
Were OM-2's and OM-2n's produced concurrently?
I can't figure out why they would produce OM-2n's without
a MD plate when, latter (but earlier than OM-2n) OM-2(non-n)'s had them.
This would assume that there was some logic behind this
which, is always a dangerous assumption.
Jon
>
> Yes.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> Jon Wichman wrote:
> >
> > Ok. Wait a second.
> > Are you saying that there were also OM-2n MD's?
> > In addition to OM-2(no "n") MD and non-MD's?
> >
> > Or, did I miss something here?
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:12 PM
> > Subject: Re: OM-2MD [OM] What's the difference between it and a OM-2
and/or
> > a OM-2n?
> >
> > > I think they removed the MD plate on the newer OM2(n). I found the S/N
> > > of my non MD OM2n is higher than the OM2n MD I once owned.
> > >
> > > C.H.Ling
> > >
> > > Jon Wichman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thank you!
> > > > Neither of the ones I've owned had/have the MD plate.
> > > > When did they start putting them on? Do you know off-hand?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Jon
> > > >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|