Subject: | Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure |
---|---|
From: | andrew fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:57:20 +1100 |
>Doesn't "debatable" have only 2 e's? > >Larry > >andrew fildes wrote: > > >> If axioms are in themselves debateable, Damn - I'm always doing that! Debateabl, of course. AndrewF < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | [OM] Last Sunday Samples, Brian Swale |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, John A. Lind |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, Larry |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OT Philosophy (was) OM4Ti Failure, John A. Lind |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |