Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 28mm vs. 24mm

Subject: Re: [OM] 28mm vs. 24mm
From: Paul Glantzman <paulg765@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 19:56:01 -0500
I just got my 28/2.8 on EBAY. It must be one of the lightest Zuiko lenses. My OM-4T feels like a body with no lens. I really like it.

Paul

At 12:55 PM 1/19/2002 -0800, you wrote:
The Zuiko 28/2.8 seems to be a lens that is only ever
mediocre in performance. It is a 'blah' lens. 24mm
IMHO is a far more exciting and nice angle to shoot
with. I get lots of nice shots with 24mm that I don't
like with 28mm. Of course this is granted with the
fact that supposedly the 28/2 is a far superior lens,
but I've never used it.

Mark Lloyd

Nope. I like the 28/2.8 a lot. 24mm is just a little over the line. 28mm is normal but with attitude.

But I've also got to have a 24 for ... when I want a 24. But the 28 is still the only lens for me, when I want a 28.

To each his own. That's what's wonderful about all these choices. (I'll take one of each ...)

Joel W.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


--

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz