The 100/2 in 9/10 condition is usually around $450.
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "M. Royer" <royer007@xxxxxxxxx>
> The 90/2 if you are going to do regular macro. This
> lens goes to 1/2 lifesize normally, the 100/2 goes to
> 1/5 lifesize normally. It would take a 30mm extension
> tube to get to 1/2 lifesize with the 100/2. The 100/2
> is a cheaper lens, but not that much cheaper
> considering. ($500-600 vs $650-750). Both are great
> lenses, the 90 is IMHO more versatile though.
>
> Mark Lloyd
>
> --- james olson <james_olson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I've been reading the debates about the 90/2 vs. the
> > 100/2... and I've been
> > looking into the Auto Extension Tubes...
> >
> > If I was to buy just one, which should it be for
> > regular Macro work?
> > (Flowers, etc.)
> >
> > The above is in direct reference to the 100/2.
> >
> > Thanks, James.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|