Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [OT] two OM items for sale -> browsers -> darkrooms

Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] two OM items for sale -> browsers -> darkrooms
From: "Bernd Moeller" <dsl33687a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:24:54 +0100
Ah, thanks Tom,

That is precisely what I wanted to know.

Bernd


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] two OM items for sale -> browsers -> darkrooms


> On Thursday, January 10, 2002 at 22:01, Bernd Moeller 
> <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote re "Re: [OM] [OT] two OM items for sale -> browsers -" saying:
> 
> > Wow. But do you actually work with the aperture wide open? Usually I
> > step down my Rodenstock 3.5/50 to f11 or f16 in order to achieve good
> > DOF and better consistency of exposure time. 
> 
> >From http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=001Kur 
>     "You may be surprised that I suggest using these lenses at full aperture. 
>     However, diffraction effects swamp improvements in optical distortion 
> even 
>     closed down a single stop. Howard Bond has done extensive testing in this 
>     area (as readers of Photo Techniques will recall), and I concur with his 
>     conclusions. I should also mention that most LF lenses (with the possible 
>     exception of certain fast -- i.e. faster than f5.6 -- press lenses) are 
>     sharpest wide open (assuming you have adequate coverage for your chosen 
>     format at that aperture). If you were comparing prints made with your 
>     lenses stopped down, you were not seeing either at its best. Try them 
> both 
>     wide open, compare them against each other and against prints made at 
>     smaller apertures. Then decide which you prefer. "
> 
> There is a lengthy discussion there. The smaller apertures are useful to 
> lengthen exposure times for easier manipulations.
> 
> The diffraction limit in lines per mm is equal to the f/stop times the 
> wavelength for a high-contrast target:
> 
> The diffraction limits in lines per mm for blue and red light are:
> F/stop Blue(400 nm) Red(700nm)
> 1.0 2500 1429
> 1.4 1768 1010
> 2.0 1250 714
> 2.8 884 505
> 4.0 625 357
> 5.7 442 253
> 8.0 313 179
> 11.3 221 126
> 16.0 156 89
> 22.6 110 63
> 32.0 78 45
> 45.3 55 32
> and so on.
> 
> DoF doesn't matter for enlarging if the film carrier, lens, and easel are 
> properly aligned (using levels) and the lens' curvature of field is 
> minimal, which is normal for an enlarging lens.
> 
> Stopping down will usually reduce any disparity in exposure between centre 
> and edge.
> 
> tOM
> 
> ------------------- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ottawa-
> photo-clubs
> tOM A. Trottier, ICQ:57647974 http://abacurial.com
> 758 Albert St, Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8 
> +1 613 860-6633 fax:231-6115 N45.412 
> W75.714
> "The moment one gives close attention to anything, 
> even a blade of grass, it becomes a mysterious, 
> awesome, indescribably magnificent world in itself -- 
> Henry Miller, 1891-1980
> 
> 
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> 
> 


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz