Does anyone have a spare hood for the 21 3.5?
----- Original Message -----
From: Winsor Crosby <wincros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] WTB 21/3.5 or /2
> >The 21/3.5 is my favorite lens (but the 300/4.5 + 1.4X-A is starting to
> >come close). I've never used a f/2, but have always been completely
> >satisfied with the f/3.5. Also, if you're concerned about damage, the
> >21/2 isn't much cheaper than the 18/3.5, although the front element isn't
> >as vulnerable.
> >
> >You can see one of my 21/3.5 photos (along with a bunch of 300+1.4X-A) at
> >http://www.cybermesa.com/~markml/Colorado/elk.html
> >although I don't think the small web photo does the lens justice.
> >
> >I also think that the Olympus hood for the 21/3.5 does wonders,
> >especially with my SC sample.
> >
> >Mark Marr-Lyon
>
> I like the 21/3.5 too. Those are nice elk photos. You must have been
> right in the middle of them. They look almost like telephoto.
> --
> Winsor Crosby
> Long Beach, California
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|