The 21/3.5 is my favorite lens (but the 300/4.5 + 1.4X-A is starting to
come close). I've never used a f/2, but have always been completely
satisfied with the f/3.5. Also, if you're concerned about damage, the
21/2 isn't much cheaper than the 18/3.5, although the front element isn't
as vulnerable.
You can see one of my 21/3.5 photos (along with a bunch of 300+1.4X-A) at
http://www.cybermesa.com/~markml/Colorado/elk.html
although I don't think the small web photo does the lens justice.
I also think that the Olympus hood for the 21/3.5 does wonders,
especially with my SC sample.
Mark Marr-Lyon
I like the 21/3.5 too. Those are nice elk photos. You must have been
right in the middle of them. They look almost like telephoto.
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|