If the 85mm is too sharp for portrait work you can always add a soft filter.
/jnm
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Henrik Dahl
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 7:39 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8
>It's nice to see so many replies, and it's food for thought, thanks Zuiks!
>However, so far the consensus appears to be that I have to have all of
them,
>in true Zuikoholic fashion. :-) Everyone has great reasons for each of
their
>recommendations, and those reasons even have some practical basis. So far
>I'm leaning towards the 100/2.8 and (thanks Barry, I'd overlooked it!) the
>85/2. Maybe both. :-/
My wote for the 85/2 for speed, a more useful (IMO) perspective and,
as Tom S said, smothness.
Henrik Dahl
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|