Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8

Subject: re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8
From: Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 08:47:42 -0800
Scott, If you already have a 135 then the 85/2 would be a good choice.
The 135 lets you get back a ways out of the subject's face and might be
less intimidating but to my eye is a bit too long and imparts a flat
look, kinda like the people are cardboard cut outs. (This is an extreme
analogy and not as bad as I make it sound) The 85 however has a more 3
dimensional look and the bokeh is smooth. It is especially useful for
two or more subjects. It has the added benefit of making a great macro
when coupled with a 14mm auto tube.

mike

Scott asked:

> ...What's everyone's opinion? Is it worthwhile investing in either of the 100s
> (and which one) for this type of shooting when I already have the 135?...
>
--
Latitude 48° 32' North, Longitude 123° 7' West



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz