Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: 35 &/or 120, and which?

Subject: [OM] Re: 35 &/or 120, and which?
From: "Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 20:14:07 +1300
Hi Albert,

A bit more confusion for the topic.

If it were me, and I thought I could cope with a rangefinder, I'd go for a Koni 
Omega Rapid M. 6x7 only, 120 or 220, depending on the back. Very good 
lenses. Fixing foam seals is usually needed now, but it's easy (I did it, so it 
must be <g>).

Brian
.............................................................
'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves          Voiceless it cries,
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe.         Wingless flutters,
All mimsy were the borogroves,           Toothless bites,
And the mome raths outgrabe.             Mouthless mutters.
                                                       
>From "Through the Looking-Glass"     Gollum's riddle to Bilbo<   
.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] Re: 35 &/or 120, and which?, Brian Swale <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz