Re: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8

[Winsor Crosby]

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Shupe" <kc7iek@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:54 PM
> Subject: RE: [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8
>
>
> Could someone explain "BOKEH" to me.  I see the term quite often on this
> forum and I think it has something to do with the out of focus background
> part of a photograph, usually mentioned with portrait type lenses.  I've
> just never been real sure what it means.
>   << snip all>>
> -------------------------
>
> Thank God someone has finally posed this question.
> I thought I was the only one in the dark on this.
> Charles Monroe
Please, please, search the archives on this one.  You might finish 
reading by Independence Day.
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >