Well, as usual, I'm on the horns of a dilemma. I've been thinking of doing
some "portrait" work. Nothing fancy, and certainly nothing professional.
Just some better shots of family.
There've been discussions here regarding the various 100mm Zuikos. I already
own a 135/2.8 Zuiko. So...
What's everyone's opinion? Is it worthwhile investing in either of the 100s
(and which one) for this type of shooting when I already have the 135? Is
there a good reason to own either of the 100s *other* than portraiture when
I already have the 135? Better bokeh with the 100 or something else I may be
unaware of?
Let's look at it from a practical standpoint--like that'll ever happen :-)
--not from the Zuikoholic standpoint. I already know the answer from the
Zuikoholic position quite well on my own (and that's what I'm trying to
fight off--or at least justify--at the moment).
---
Scott Gomez
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|