Subject: | Re: [OM] Digital woes |
---|---|
From: | DAVDOU9211@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Fri, 4 Jan 2002 23:12:49 EST |
In a message dated 1/4/02 8:07:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, charles@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > but please oh please not my OM > list..... > It's ok Charles. We have discussed SUVs, Australian cuzine, Wyoming fencing and many other topics. We all are still bound by the OM mystique. It is a pendulum thing and so it will swing back to OM-1s and their use. Have I told you about the fun I get from doing photography with my OM-1 ... like fine wine, it gets better with age. Dave Dougherty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Digital woes, Charles Sdunek |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Digital P&S vs. OM, Larry |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] 100/2.8 vs 100/2 vs 135/2.8, Scott Gomez |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] Digital woes, James N. McBride |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |