Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] 24 vs 36 exposure debate

Subject: [OM] 24 vs 36 exposure debate
From: "Olympus" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 10:07:22 -0800
Ok, I'm about to head out for a "Grandma's cooking, grandkids invited only"
luncheon..

Here's the question I have for you all.  When I was on vacation in taiwan,
they only sold rolls of 36 in taiwan, there are no 24's, but since I was
clicking away like an idiot, I was happy to buy longer rolls, so I don't
have to change as often..  But now, I'm stuck with half a roll of 36 left in
my camera of Fuji Superia, to shoot an indoor luncheon.. arrrg...

So the 24 shot roll offers a better chance of finishing up a roll so I can
change to something else, but the 36 is a little bit less film to carry when
I'm on vacation..

I'd like to hear your preferences and the justifications (if any)..

Albert

FUD Dispell::  Someone told me pictures taken from a 36roll is worse quality
than a 24, because of the roll size??  I can't imagine this being true??
Someone dispell this FUD for me??  Thanks.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz