Subject: | RE: [OM] Vivitar 200/3 was: 200/4 -vs- 200/5? |
---|---|
From: | "Skip Williams" <skipwilliamsom@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 19 Dec 2001 13:15:24 -0500 |
Cc: | DanielMitchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
I nabbed my Vivitar S1 200/3 from a German EBay auction for <$100 2 months
ago. The display showed the price in DM (which was around Dm250); so I
think many people thought it was too expensive <gg>. Most are $2-300. The
mount changes the price. Most seem to appear in the Pentax M42 mount for
some reason.
Skip From: "Daniel J. Mitchell" <DanielMitchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: "'olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [OM] Vivitar 200/3 was: 200/4 -vs- 200/5? Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:53:43 -0700 >One just sold for about $265 on ebay a few weeks ago. Know that > doesn't answer the question, but thought you might be interested. Ah, thanks -- that puts a more favorable perspective on the price. (the Zuikos locally are a bit over skipwilliams's average, so I was assuming everything was. One sample from e*ay isn't conclusive, but it's still good to know. The only other price I saw for this when poking around on the netwas 141DM (US$65; that was in a Konica mount, though) which is a _heck_ of alot cheaper than it was locally.. -- dan < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > _________________________________________________________________MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] [OT] signing off for Christmas, Timpe, Jim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Fwd: Re: [OM] Cross-group posting, Giles |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] Vivitar 200/3 was: 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Tom |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] Vivitar 200/3 was: 200/4 -vs- 200/5?, Daniel J. Mitchell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |