Re: [OM] A bargain 90mm f2.0 and 300mm f4.5?

[Giles]

Even if the 90/2 were in poor condition it would probably be a bargain at $100

Does anyone really think someone is going to sell a 90/2 for the same 
price as a 135/2.8, unless they know nothing about them in which case 
the seller probably is not the rightful owner?
It is far more likely that the price is a misprint and should have 
been $1000, a far more realistic price.
Giles

> Firstly, no connection to the below, and secondly, the
> below are in Aussie dollars.
>
>  Olympus Zuiko lens 135mm f2.8 -$100 Yeronga 3892 5471
>
>  Olympus Zuiko lens 90mm f2.0 -$100 Yeronga 3892 5471 
>
> All being sold by the same person in Victoria, Australia
> as you can see from the phone number.
>
> I'm thinking of a 135 2.8, but the cheap prices of the
> others make me wonder about condition of them all (and
> if they were all decent condition, that 90 2.0 looks
> mighty fine instead).
>
> Just thought others might want a look-see (or curse me
> for bringing it to everyone's attention <g>)
>
> Cheers
> Marc
> Sydney, Oz
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >