Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Thank you (was Intro)

Subject: Re: [OM] Thank you (was Intro)
From: Giles <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 09:05:34 +0000

The 21/3.5 is on par with the 21/2

IMO if you have a 50/1.2 you do not need a 1.4 and vice versa. You only need the 24/3.5 PC shift, just take few steps closer to compensate for not having the 35/2.8 PC. You do not need the 85/2 if you have a 90/2, however the opposite is not the case ;-). You do not need the 135/2.8 if you have a 180/2.8, though you might want one if you have a 180/2 when you want to travel light. You don't need a 35-105/3.5 if you have a 35-80/2.8. If you have a 35-80/2.8 you could do without a 35mm, 50mm and 80 or 90mm prime (if you do not need the macro capability of the 90mm).

T32 ok, motor drive one instead of winder 2.

You left off the 18/3.5 ;and the 100/2, if you don't need macro, an excellent and cheaper alternative to the 90/2)

Giles


>From what I gather , the following "items"is the 'must have' for every zuiko lovers :21/2
                    24/2.8 28/2  50/1.2  50/1.4(>1100000)
                    24/3.5 AND 35/2.8 PC shift
                    85/2  90/2  135/2.8  180/2 or 2.8
                    35-105 3.5/4.5   35-80 2.8
                    T32 Flash  and winder 2

am I right? ... wow ...silent........."oh dear, where to find them? "

Now I just have to convince my wife that I really "Need" these lenses.

Regards,

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz