Henry,
I would hope it would too. I could have gotten a MIB OM3 for that. I
would really like that or a 3Ti for Christmas, but my wife is not
listening. I'll get the 35-80 one of these days, just not now.
Thanks,
John
Henry Bottjer-BA wrote:
>
> I've ben very satisfied with my 35-70 f3.5-4.5 lens. I hear the "S" series
> lenses are targeted at the consumer level, and this is one of them, but I
> used this lens so much that my 50mm ended up getting sticky aperture
> syndrome from lack of use. I find I keep the lens on the camera quite a
> lot. I'm sure the 35-80 f2.8 lens allows for more light and it scores a bit
> higher on Gary Reese / Popular Photography lens tests but at around $1800
> list I would hope so!
>
> Good luck,
> Henry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of John&Julie Ockman
> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 3:04 PM
> To: Olympus List
> Subject: [OM] Which 35-70Zuiko
>
> Hello all Zuikoholics,
>
> What is your favorite of the 3 Zuiko 35mm-70mm lenses? Which one has
> the best bokeh? And which is the sharpest in you eye? I have a
> 28mm-48mm/f4 that I am absolutely in love with(yes, my wife knows), but
> am thinking of getting a 35mm-70mm for that little added length. None of
> the prices on them seem exorbitant, so I am not that worried about the
> prices. Or maybe, I should stick with my 28mm-48mm/f4, 28mm/f2.8, and
> 100mm/f2.8, and forget another lens.
> Regards,
> John
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|