Subject: | RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5 |
---|---|
From: | "Daniel J. Mitchell" <DanielMitchell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 5 Dec 2001 09:43:54 -0700 |
> If you are looking for a > cheaper superwide look for a Tokina 17mm (there is one > on ebay right now at a too high price) I picked a Vivitar 17mm (which is the same, I think) up from a listmember for $90 or so; it's a nice lens, sharp, relatively small, and cheap for what you get. Some samples: http://www.danielmitchell.net/gallery/albums/Autumn_In_Calgary/tree1.jpg http://www.danielmitchell.net/gallery/albums/LakeMinnewanka/Beach.jpg http://www.danielmitchell.net/gallery/albums/LakeMinnewanka/Path1.jpg http://www.danielmitchell.net/gallery/albums/LakeMinnewanka/River1.jpg (the most noticeably wide-angle one) -- dan < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM]Looking for:, W.Xato |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Using the 65-116 auto extension tube with other lenses, Daniel J. Mitchell |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, Barry B. Bean |
Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] cheaper alternative to a 16/3.5, James N. McBride |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |