Well,
all I can say is that large format is definitely not an option. He's
training to be an architect not an architectural photographer. I guess that
his pictures are more a form of record for the buildings he sees. I'm not
sure. He's only a casual photographer but he needs a shift lens for this
specific purpose.
I'm a little confused by the replies, the price range for the 35mm shift
seems to range from $303 - $4500 ? Which is the more likely one? Also, does
anyone here want to sell your 35mm shift?
--adi
----- Original Message -----
From: "M. Royer" <royer007@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus shift lens
>>>>> Canon has a nice selection of lenses that
> can tilt as well as shift. These lenses IMHO sacrafice
> a lot more than the Zuikos in terms of portability,
> useability, general feel, and IMHO picture sharpness.
> They are clunky and heavy and pretty much restricted
> to a tripod whereas the Zuikos are portable and easy
> to use.
>
> If you go Canon why not just get a large format which
> will give you the best options for architecture from a
> tripod. Olympus, however, provides an option for
> architecture which is portable and discreet while
> Canon seems to try to emulate large format in 35mm but
> they lose mobility and discreetness. In other words
> Canon gives up many of 35mm's advantages while not
> gaining that many of large format's.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|