ML Archiv: Re: [OM] PICS

Subject:	Re: [OM] PICS
From:	Jim Couch <JamesBCouch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 09 Nov 2001 10:19:06 -0800

Being a flash for a digital camera it has to be more expensive. It emits special
'digital' light instead of 'analog' light waves. I am suprised you did not know
this. :)

Jim Couch

Tom Scales wrote:

> My goodness.  $290 for the FL-40.
>
> What's so special about it?  Looks just like a G40 to me.
>
> Tom
>

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] PICS, (continued) Re: [OM] PICS, Thomas Bryhn Re: [OM] PICS, Jim Couch Re: [OM] PICS, John Hermanson Re: [OM] PICS, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] PICS, Tom Scales Re: [OM] PICS, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] PICS, John Hermanson Re: [OM] PICS, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] PICS, Tom Scales Re: [OM] PICS, Jay Maynard Re: [OM] PICS, Jim Couch <= Re: [OM] PICS, M. Royer Re: [OM] PICS, Andrew Beals <bandy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Re: [OM] PICS, John Hermanson [OM] FL40, Tom Scales Re: [OM] FL40, John Hermanson Re: [OM] PICS, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] PICS, John Hermanson Re: [OM] Printing, John Hermanson Re: [OM] Printing, Tom Scales Re: [OM] Printing, John Pendley

Previous by Date:	RE: [OM] The elusive OM-3Ti, Timpe, Jim
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] PICS, Jim Couch
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] PICS, Jay Maynard
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] PICS, M. Royer
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]