Subject: | Re: [OM] NY Times: pros switching to digital photography |
---|---|
From: | "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 7 Nov 2001 11:44:28 -0600 |
You hit the exact reason I went back to 35mm and why it will be in my kit for a long time. Indoor sports. Digital can't do it. Period. Tom From: "Paul Farrar" <snip> Kennerly made a big deal over how he was going to shoot the > White House transition in digital, and his shots looked awful. > Digital, even without artifacts, has a long way to go for > interior available light. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Photoshop Results!, Roger Wesson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Photoshop Results!, Daniel J. Mitchell |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] NY Times: pros switching to digital photography, Paul Farrar |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] NY Times: pros switching to digital photography, Andrew Beals <bandy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |