--- Gary Edwards <garyetx@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
<<<Both are nice shots, Warren, but I prefer the 16,
don't you?
Gary>>>
Well, yeah. Unabashedly, yes. It's extremely
contrasty, sharp and gives a totally unique view of
the world. And if you use it for scenics, it's not
fishy at all.
Wind caves at Anza Borrego Desert State Park
http://members.aol.com:/wkato/images/anzab/10700b26.jpg
These oak branches at the top of this photo were
beyond over my had and the holly berries were about 9
inches from the lens:
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/wkato/myhomepage/holly01v.jpg
Or you can go for the distorted effect at Moro Rock in
Sequoia NP.
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/wkato/images/sequoia.jpg
Or weird buildings in downtown Los Angeles:
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/wkato/images/buildings.jpg
I still haven't fired up Dersch's distortion
straightening program. What will I end up with? I
guess it will look like a stretched rubber sheet
that's been pulled from all 4 corners.
Warren
=====
Warren Xato
For where to go when you know when
-PhotoDates-and-Places@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
