Thanks for the thoughts. The two TOPE entries that were pointed
out after your email really seem to support what you're saying.
I've never been happy with the barrel distortion in the photos I've
seen, but it looks like with careful composition it can be gold.
Thanks again,
-jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "gries" <gries@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 6:21 AM
Subject: RE: [OM] 16/3.5
> I have both the 18 & 16, and although I get more use out of the 18, the
> 16 is definitely more fun. Somewhat more difficult to control, but when
> you get a good shot, it is worth it. Try not to be too discouraged by
> the plethora of "yeah, that's a fisheye alright" shots. When you get a
> good shot, it is gold.
>
> <snip>
>
> 16/3.5 before a 18/3.5?
> Does anyone have good sample photos taken with a 16/3.5?
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|