Subject: | Re: [OM] Vivitar S1 200/3 vs. 180/2.8? |
---|---|
From: | "John Cwiklinski" <johncw@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 29 Oct 2001 11:02:36 -0800 |
John R wrote: >>You might want to consider a Tamron SP 180mm f2.5 in that group.<< I've heard of this one, but I can't seem to find it (used), or maybe I'm looking incorrectly. Do you have a pointer, by chance? Is this lens very heavy? ditto your comments on the V S/I 200 f3. ________________ John Cwiklinski < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Vivitar S1 200/3 vs. 180/2.8 and Tamron 180mm f2.5, Pandionhalietius |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Vivitar S1 200/3 vs. 180/2.8 and Tamron 180mm f2.5, John Cwiklinski |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Vivitar S1 200/3 vs. 180/2.8?, Pandionhalietius |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Vivitar Bazooka, Bob Whitmire |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |