They did. You weren't listening. They never listen.
They're 17. They KNOW, OK?!
Sigh.
AndrewF
>Good (in that we agree ;-). But why did my teachers at school (High
>School equivalent for you chaps over there) not tell me that
>development time was so important?
>
>Mind you, the few prints that I still have from then (1971/2) were
>developed OK...
>
>Chris
>
>At 14:57 -0500 3/10/01, Barry B. Bean wrote:
>>On Wed, 3 Oct 2001 07:23:04 +0100, Chris Barker wrote:
>>
>>>The most important lesson that I came away with (apart from the need
>>>for simplicity and consistency) was that you *must* give each print
>>>its full time in the developer. I had been getting muddy dark tones
>>>and off-whites, probably through taking the print out when it
>>>*looked* right.
>>
>>On that we agree. My development goes pretty much by the book. I
>>prefer to keep my printing variability limited to exposure, and
>>contrast at the developer.
>>-
>>B.B. Bean bbbean@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|