Subject: | Re: [OM] S# 1000000? |
---|---|
From: | "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 3 Oct 2001 13:52:03 -0500 |
Perhaps I am missing something. Why couldn't this just be what it says it is. Serial number 1000000. The run was long enough to cross the number. Tom > : Is this a prototype or what? > : > : http://cgi.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1279393392 > > The first print (1975) of Pangerl's Die Welt des OM Systems (translated as > The world of OM Systems) contains a photo of a OM-2 pre-production prototype > which was shown at the Photokina 1974. It differs from the camera on ebay in > two ways - it has a graphical logo on the self-timer (consisting of 4 > elipses), and has no MD logo. > > The 1000000 camera could be the first official production model. > > hnz > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Bernd Moeller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] OM-2n red vs. green Flash LED, Garth Wood |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Daan Kalmeijer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Craig Henrikson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |