ML Archiv: Re: [OM] S# 1000000?

Subject:	Re: [OM] S# 1000000?
From:	"Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 3 Oct 2001 12:46:15 -0500

I don't think the box or manual ever said 2n.  The manual always says 2, but
the pictures inside are a 2n.

Tom

> I note (without knowing that it means anything) that the box and manual
are
> for a 2, not a 2N.
>
> Craig
>
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Poll on Focusing Screens, (continued) [OM] Poll on Focusing Screens, M. Royer Re: [OM] Poll on Focusing Screens, Bruce Hamm [OM] Zuiko 50 mm f1.4 'M' lens, Neal Jones Re: [OM] Zuiko 50 mm f1.4 'M' lens, Mark Dapoz Re: [OM] Zuiko 50 mm f1.4 'M' lens, Tom A. Trottier [OM] S# 1000000?, Daan Kalmeijer RE: [OM] S# 1000000?, Olaf Greve Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, John Hermanson Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Craig Henrikson Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, John Hermanson Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Tom Scales <= Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Craig Henrikson Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Hans van Veluwen Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Daan Kalmeijer Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Craig Henrikson Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Tom A. Trottier Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Tom Scales Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Daryl Hurley Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, John Hermanson Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Daryl Hurley

Previous by Date:	RE: [OM] Aurorae Borealis - a bit OT, Daniel J. Mitchell
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Hans van Veluwen
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, John Hermanson
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] S# 1000000?, Craig Henrikson
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]