Welcome back Garth!
I have alwasy loved Kodachrome. I have been playing with a number of different
films lately, but still really prefer the Kodachrome for almost everything. One
of my all time favorite films! Fortunatly for me the turnaround is much
shorter, usually three or four days. You should be able to buy the film w/o
mailers (which is how I do it) which would save you a fair amount of money.
I just picked up a couple of rolls of Kodachrome 200 to try out. I have not
really found a 200 slide film that I am really happy with, (although the Agfa
is not bad.) hoping that the Kodak will fill the bill.
Jim Couch
Garth Wood wrote:
> After Giles' and Tom Scales' e-mails to me (and some others), I decided "Oh,
> what the Hell..." Thanks for actually giving a rat's patootie about my
> membership.
>
SNIP
>
> Once again, I'm falling in love with Kodachrome 64, after having shot a
> couple of rolls for old times' sake. Awesome colour fidelity and rendition.
> Nice saturation. Incredibly fine grain. I know very little about the
> genius(es) who created this stuff around 60 years ago, but I tip my hat to
> 'em. Now I'm gonna blow a few rolls of the stuff on the fall foliage around
> these parts. My only regret is that fewer and fewer places anywhere are
> processing Kodachrome, so turnaround times are long (I'm averaging two to
> three weeks) and costs remain high. (And the included mailers are virtually
> useless in Canada.)
>
> **HEAVY SIGH**
>
> I even like Kodachrome for portraiture, certainly as much as any "dedicated"
> portraiture film like Portra. I wonder if Kodak would ever consider
> *improving* the stuff, or if digital has it doomed.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|