Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] New book barely mentions OM

Subject: Re: [OM] New book barely mentions OM
From: andrew fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:24:29 +1000
Michael's on the CVUG list (what a small world this is) so I passed on your
comments and invited his reply. Potential for some good interlist flaming
here! :)
AndrewF


>Amherst Media has a new book out titled something like "How to Select
>and Use Classic Cameras" by Michael Levy.  In his 35mm SLR section he
>says only Nikon, Canon, Pentax, Minolta and Olympus SLR's should be
>considered worth collecting and using.  But he contradicts himself later
>on with Alpa and Leicaflex lust.  He devotes lots of text to the Nikon
>F, but short changes everything else, including Olympus. To the Olympus
>OM, he devotes one paragraph, in which he says he had a (presumably
>used) OM-1, but it "died" after 2 years.  (Why didn't you fix it,
>Michael?).  But he really liked the "105mm" Olympus lens. Huh?  A 105mm
>Olympus lens?
>
>Golly gee, another poorly edited book (there are lots of other
>problems).  I think it even had a copyright date of 2002.  It's at
>Border's.
>
>BTW, I'd consider a Konica over a Minolta SLR any day of the week!
>
>Gary Reese
>Las Vegas, NV





< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz