| Subject: | Re: [OM] New book barely mentions OM |
|---|---|
| From: | "O.C" <oben@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:25:56 +1000 |
To the Olympus OM, he devotes one paragraph, in which he says he had a (presumably used) OM-1, but it "died" after 2 years. (Why didn't you fix it, Michael?). But he really liked the "105mm" Olympus lens. Huh? A 105mm Olympus lens? I don't see this as terribly negative. The fact that the Olympus system remains a secret is actually a good thing in my opinion. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Niagra Falls kit?, Michael Darling |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Re: [OT] hearing corn growing??, O.C |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] New book barely mentions OM, C.H.Ling |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] New book barely mentions OM, andrew fildes |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |