| Subject: | Re: [OM] 1.4x-A w/ or w/o Zuiko 180/2.8 - 1xxxxx -> 200083 by 1984? |
|---|---|
| From: | Gary Reese <pcacala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:26:46 -0700 |
Dave B. writes: << Maybe there's s simpler explanation for the change from 1xxxxx to 2xxxxx. Pick from the following. >> Maybe they just wanted to drive us crazy :-) Gary Reese Las Vegas, NV < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Zuiko 85 f2 vs Zuiko 90 f2 Macro, Skip Williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM2S only does 1/60th, sort of? Bricks., Ken N |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] 1.4x-A w/ or w/o Zuiko 180/2.8 - 1xxxxx -> 200083 by 1984?, DBellamy2k |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Ordered NiCads, Tom Scales |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |