At 01:55 AM 8/8/2001 -0400, you wrote:
Actually, I was talking about the Sigma 28 f1.8 that was referenced in
that post.
The Tamron 90mm f/2.8 already has been pointed out to be inferior to the
f/2.5. My
experience has been more with the zuiko, and the AT-X, which in a similar
enlargement situation to yours, the difference was indiscernable.
Larry
...
I have a Tamron 90/2.5 (which I will ship to a lister tomorrow to help pay
for the Zuiko 90/2) and it is very sharp, in my opinion.
// richard http://www.imagecraft.com
[ For technical support, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|