Subject: | Re: [OM] Why an OM-3? |
---|---|
From: | "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 5 Aug 2001 11:06:10 +0800 |
As I have mentioned before, bracket only work for still objects, in many case not... even for portrait. Think about one's expression in the eye can be changed in one tenth of a second. C.H.Ling ----- Original Message ----- From: "James N. McBride" > If one has the time to use the extra metering capabilities of the OM-3 one > also has the time to bracket exposures with the OM-1 for a lot less money. > /jim > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] FS OM-4 (two of them), C.H.Ling |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Exciting Times on the Internet, Ken N |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] Why an OM-3?, James N. McBride |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Why an OM-3?, Henrik Dahl |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |