Titoy,
In a word COLOR! 9 times out of 10 when I get film back with brilliant color,
it was done with the ProImage 100 (ProPhoto in Europe, I believe). As I am
fairly new to photography, I can't really compare it to many films other than
Kodak Royal Gold 100 & 400. It seems to have decent grain and a fairly good
tolerance for exposure. That plus it's a lot cheaper than may pro films out
there make it my film of choice for now. I don't see it around very often, only
in my local camera shop.
I defer to the experts - has anyone else used this film? What are your thoughts
on it (I'm not emotionally attached to it, so be honest)?
Thanks,
Mike V. <><
----- Original Message -----
From: Clemente Colayco
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 9:19 AM
Subject: [OM] Proimage 100
Hi Mike
As per experience what would you say are the positive and negative
characteristics of the Proimage 100 and would you know how it compares to the
Supra 100?
Regards
Titoy
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Virsinger
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 12:48 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] [OT] Getting pysched...
<Snip>The film was Kodak ProImage 100. Exposure not and aperture not
recorded. The scan is not clean and I will have to re-do it, but once again the
75-150 surprises me with it's performance, even wide open.
|