Almost forgot about the 28mm f2, which was our main topic. What it does
with light images stops nothing short of superb. Can't speak to the f2.8 as
I've never worked with one. It could be very competent as well. But the 2's
something special, and that's for sure.
Tris
At 07:18 PM 7/22/01 +0200, you wrote:
Why is the f2 better than the f2.8, except for the 2/3 step (or whatever
it is) in light?
Henrik
Looks to be in fair shape, and if it is you'll never put your eye to a
better performing Zuiko--unless it's a 28mm f2.
Tris
At 11:29 PM 7/22/01 +1000, you wrote:
Here's what I think is a rare chance to get one of these lenses that
I've been raving on about lately.
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1257671968
No reserve so should be good.
No connection to seller.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|