Subject: | Re: [OM] A 100mm f2 |
---|---|
From: | Henrik Dahl <hdahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 22 Jul 2001 19:18:21 +0200 |
Why is the f2 better than the f2.8, except for the 2/3 step (or whatever it is) in light? Henrik Looks to be in fair shape, and if it is you'll never put your eye to a better performing Zuiko--unless it's a 28mm f2.Tris At 11:29 PM 7/22/01 +1000, you wrote:Here's what I think is a rare chance to get one of these lenses that I've been raving on about lately.http://cgi.ebay.com.au/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1257671968 No reserve so should be good. No connection to seller. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Virsus, Alan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 65-200 vs. 50-250, Jim Brokaw |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] A 100mm f2, Tris Schuler |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] A 100mm f2, Tris Schuler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |