| Subject: | RE: [OM] 200/4 vs. 2X-A (Was 100/2 vs. 85/2 in sharpness) |
|---|---|
| From: | "gries" <gries@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:49:48 -0500 |
That's good to hear! I'm still not sure what I would need 400mm for, but you never know.... <snip> I have the 200/f4 and the 2X-A, and the combination is very sharp! < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: HTML and the list, DAVDOU9211 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Panic ! Heart attack !, Mickey Trageser |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200/4 vs. 2X-A (Was 100/2 vs. 85/2 in sharpness), Donald Shedrick |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [OM] 200/4 vs. 2X-A (Was 100/2 vs. 85/2 in sharpness), Donald Shedrick |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |