Subject: | Re: [OM] 200/4 vs. 2X-A (Was 100/2 vs. 85/2 in sharpness) |
---|---|
From: | Doggre@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:36:07 EDT |
In a message dated 7/12/01 1:15:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time, gries@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Have you had a chance to test it out w/ the 200/4? What are your > feelings about it? > Not yet.... I can't seem to get out of doors... too much temptation on *Bay.... help.... I'm ......losing.......control......... Rich < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] E*bay bites me in the a**, James N. McBride |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Maco IR film, Eric Pederson |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] 200/4 vs. 2X-A (Was 100/2 vs. 85/2 in sharpness), gries |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200/4 vs. 2X-A (Was 100/2 vs. 85/2 in sharpness), Donald Shedrick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |