OK, I have both the 90/2 and the 80/4 Auto-Macro lenses, and I really never
use the 80/4, so I'm thinking about if I need to keep it. Yea, yea, I know
the Zuikoholic issues here, but that's not what I'm asking.
I haven't shot with the 80/4 much, but the 90/2 isn't leaving, so I'd like
to get feedback on why I should keep the 80. Is the 1:1 or better
performance significantly better on the bellows lens? Can't I just use the
90/2 on the 65-112 or bellows to get the same results?
Skip
****** I M P O R T A N T R E P L Y I N F O ************
Please adddress ALL offlist messages to skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx
This email address is ONLY used for this mailing list subscription and
posting purposes. I read the list via Hotmail.com or the web-based archives
to keep the traffing down on my email account.
I will probably not notice any private messages addressed to this
HOtmail.com email address.
***********************************************************
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|