ML Archiv: RE: [OM][OT] Feet and Metres

Subject:	RE: [OM][OT] Feet and Metres - was OT Tallest tree
From:	"Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 8 Jul 2001 15:32:30 +1000

Winsor wrote:
>
> I have to agree that I find it easier to quickly divide a flash guide
> number by 8 feet in my head than by 2.4 meters, but then I am
> probably more challenged than most.

Maybe, but it's easier to divide a GN in meters by 2 (meters) than 6.6
(feet).

...Wayne


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] OT Tallest tree, (continued) RE: [OM] OT Tallest tree, Chip Stratton Re: [OM] OT Tallest tree, Dirk Wright [OM] HELP: Value of 24mm shift, johnsonpa Re: [OM] HELP: Value of 24mm shift, Jim Brokaw RE: [OM] OT Tallest tree, andrew fildes Re: RE: [OM] OT Tallest tree, astaire Re: [OM] OT Tallest tree, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] Feet and Metres - was OT Tallest tree, andrew fildes Re: [OM][OT] Feet and Metres - was OT Tallest tree, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM][OT] Feet and Metres - was OT Tallest tree, andrew fildes RE: [OM][OT] Feet and Metres - was OT Tallest tree, Wayne Harridge <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM][OT] Feet and Metres - was OT Tallest tree, andrew fildes
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] fast OM lenses in low contrast lighting..., Doggre
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM][OT] Feet and Metres - was OT Tallest tree, andrew fildes
Next by Thread:	[OM] TOPE 6 Alternate Entry, Michael Virsinger
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM][OT] Feet and Metres - was OT Tallest tree