Dear Jim 8^)
<< You won't be 'complete' until you can say "I have an M-1, OM-1, OM-1MD,
OM-1n, OM-2, OM-2n, OM-2S,OM-3, OM-3T, OM-4, OM-4T, OM-10, OM-20, OM-30, and
OM-40, and I USUALLY use my... " >>
Ah, but then you have to have the OM-4Ti because the American version is
missing an 'i', then the Champagne version, and black and chrome models of
the OM1s and 2s etc. Where does it end? Bankruptcy perhaps?
Dave Bellamy.
http://hometown.aol.com/sitesearch/
The problem with collectin OM's as I see it is that Olympus does not
encourage it like Leitz does with thier Leica cameras. No special
editions, no minutae differences between versions of the same camera,
etc. I get the feeling that Olympus would rather just see us
disappear. I don't think OM's are any more collectable than Canon
FD's or Pentax Spotmatics. Perhaps if Olympus had issued special
National Geographic limited editions of thier cameras, or the
occasional really wild lens, like a 35/1.4 or something. Until I was
apprised of the fact, I had always assumed that NG photogs used Nikon
gear. I never saw Olympus leverage their professional exposure, but I
wasn't in to OM's back in the 70's and 80's, so I could be wrong on
that.
--
Be seeing you.
Dirk Wright
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|